Home/Resources/Child Care/The Child Care Paradox: Families Pay More, Educators Earn Less

The Child Care Paradox: Families Pay More, Educators Earn Less

Key Takeaways

  • Early educators earn nearly $10 less than the median US worker.
  • Parents pay an average of 22% of their household income on child care.
  • Without public investment, families and providers cannot shoulder this burden alone.
America’s child care system is collapsing . Families are paying more than they can afford, while the very educators who make care possible remain some of the lowest-paid workers in the country. The result? Families are squeezed, programs are closing, and children are caught in the middle.

The numbers tell the story.

  • Early educators earn just $13.07 an hour on average, nearly $10 less than the median US worker, and in no state do their wages reach a living standard. They do important work to keep our economy thriving, yet they cannot make ends meet.
  • Parents are paying child care costs that rival college tuition or a mortgage. On average, it’s 22% of their household income. For single parents, that burden can be closer to 35% of income.

The high cost of child care isn’t because educators are overpaid or because centers are hoarding profits. It’s because the profession relies on intensive, hands-on work, low child-to-staff ratios for safety, and rising overhead like rent and insurance, all without the public funding that supports K-12 education.

When early childhood programs are forced to close, the effects ripple far beyond parents, affecting babies’ development, family stability, and community health.

Median Hourly Wages by Occupation
Ranking of Median Hourly Wages in ECE and K-12 Education

It’s a system that leaves families, educators, and communities struggling.

What’s more, these challenges fall unevenly. Black early educators earn nearly $8,000 less annually than white peers with the same education. Infant and toddler teachers make thousands less than those teaching preschoolers, despite the critical importance of the earliest years. And programs serving low-income families are most at risk of closure, deepening inequities that already leave too many children behind.

Child-care workers are severely underpaid, often earning barely enough to get by and with no real path to ever make much more.

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal points to solutions that deserve serious attention: stronger public investment to ease costs for families, tax credits to support both parents and providers, and employer-backed benefits that treat child care as essential infrastructure. These align with what the data make clear: without public investment, families and providers cannot shoulder this burden alone.

The alternative is what TIME warns of: closures on a scale that destabilizes entire communities. Until we invest in needed public funding, parents will pay more than they can manage, while educators earn less than they can live on.

We’re getting to an inflection point. I think enough of us are going to close that they’re going to have to do something.

The crisis is no longer a quiet one.

Families are exiting the workforce when care is unavailable, educators are burning out, and communities are losing vital child care centers. Without significant policy action to treat child care as the public good it is, these pressures will only intensify.

Babies need high-quality child care that is centered on relationships with trained providers and follows hard-won regulations that protect children’s health, safety and learning. We also need increased public investment to support.

Policymakers need to hear from you.

Tell Congress to make babies and families a national priority.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Next Up
distillation
The Case for Better Compensation of Early Educators
Despite the immense importance of their work, early childhood educators often face inadequate compensation and undervaluation in society.