Across the country, families are facing a decision that should not exist: keep working or stay home because child care is too expensive, unavailable, or both. It is not a rare dilemma. It is a national pattern that exposes the deep cracks in our child care system.
In many communities, especially rural ones, quality child care is either unaffordable or nonexistent.
That is the reality Gabby faced in Arizona. With no licensed providers in her county for children under age three, she and her husband had to rely on Facebook groups to find care, never knowing if it would be safe or stable. When their fourth child was born, Gabrielle left her job. Not because she wanted to, but because they had no other option.
It is a financial trap that families across income levels are stuck in. Jessica, a mom of five in Vermont, had to scale back her career because the cost of full-time child care made working financially pointless. Only because her parents could relocate and help did she manage to avoid leaving the workforce entirely.
Quality Is Not Just Scarce, It Is Unreachable
For many parents, even when care is available, it comes with tradeoffs.
T’Kayla in Missouri is on track to pay $24,000 a year for child care, more than she owes in student loans. The price of a safe, nurturing environment for her daughters should not be higher than a college degree, but in America’s current system, it is.
Carly in Tennessee thought she had found a solution. She joined a waitlist for a highly rated center before her daughter Hazel was even born. But just before returning to work, the center stopped accepting infants under 18 months. Like many parents, Carly had to reduce her hours and rely on a patchwork of part-time care and shifting work schedules. It is working for now, but it is not sustainable.
Did you know?
📉 In 2023, the US Chamber of Commerce Foundation reported that child care issues cost states anywhere from $500 million to over $2 billion annually in economic activity.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant is the main way the federal government helps families afford care, but it reaches only a small portion of those who qualify and almost none of those in the middle who are squeezed out by both cost and income thresholds.
Royce in Alabama started looking for care when she was just three months pregnant. Waitlists ran up to two years. Even if they could find a spot, the $220-a-week price tag was unaffordable. They made too much to qualify for assistance, yet not enough to cover the costs. When their baby Sovanny was born, they still did not have child care. Royce had to take time off work. They had no choice.
I want to contribute to the workforce but can't because lack of child care is such an obstacle.
These Are the Faces of Strolling Thunder 2025
Gabrielle, Jessica, T’Kayla, Carly — and dozens of others — are among the 51 families traveling to Washington, DC for Strolling Thunder 2025. They’re bringing their babies, toddlers and lived experiences directly to policymakers to make one thing clear: the child care crisis is not abstract. It’s personal, it’s urgent, and it spans every corner of the country.
Families are not asking for luxuries. They are asking for a basic foundation that allows them to work, contribute, and raise their children in safe environments.
Quality child care supports early development. It helps children thrive. But it also supports parents, the economy, and entire communities.
That is why policymakers must not only invest in programs like the Child Care and Development Block Grant, but also oppose cuts to essential child care funding streams that existing providers rely on, including the Social Services Block Grant and the Child Care Entitlement to States. Without strong public investment, families will keep making impossible choices. And the cost of that, both in lost potential and economic strain, is something we all pay.