Innovation

Parents as Partners: Clinic Policy Collaborative

Durham

Private pediatric practice15 practicing clinicians serving approximately 8,000 families  

Family engagement activities related to the well-child visit

Equitable clinic policy design and shared decision-making

Parent leadership integration in bilingual community settings

Use strengths-based observations and positive, affirming feedback

Create opportunities for families to connect with other families

Integrate strategies to support the parents’ wellbeing and mental health

Cultivate community partnerships through clear processes and protocols

Foster care team communication and collaboration

Create environments and structures that promote respectful relationships and positive patient experiences

Description

Parents as Partners: Clinic Policy Collaborative is an innovation that redefines how clinic policies are created, positioning parents and caregivers as partners and co-designers of the systems that shape their healthcare experiences.

This equity-centered collaborative brings families and clinic teams together to review, revise, and co-create policies that influence access, communication, and trust. Parents serve as policy advisors, providing insights for areas such as no-show procedures, scheduling protocols, and communication systems. By embedding bilingual, culturally responsive feedback loops, the collaborative promotes mutual accountability and understanding. The result is a more inclusive clinic culture where policies support engagement, reduce barriers, and strengthen family-provider relationships. 

Need / Problem Statement

The Durham Proof Point Community (PPC) sought to close the gap between clinic policy decisions, tone of the communication, and the lived experiences of the families most affected by them.

Historically, policies such as missed appointment protocols and scheduling rules were developed internally without family input. These policies often felt punitive or confusing to caregivers, inadvertently discouraging families from seeking care. There was no formal process for parents to share feedback or shape solutions. Key drivers of the need included:

  • Parents reporting that clinic policies, particularly no-show rules, created fear and disengagement
  • Staff observing frequent misunderstandings and administrative frustration related to missed visits
  • Families wanting a structured way to communicate barriers such as transportation, childcare, or immigration-related safety concerns

The lack of co-created policies eroded trust and continuity of care, while staff experienced inefficiencies and stress related to policy enforcement. As an additional access consideration, the policy collaborative emphasized bilingual and culturally grounded approaches to ensure families from diverse backgrounds could meaningfully participate. 

Process

The design process emerged from ongoing dialogue between parent leaders and clinic partners who recognized the need to align policies with real family experiences.

Key partners and roles included: 

  • Parent Advisory Team (PAT) members offered firsthand insights and led prioritization of policies for redesign.
  • The PSP program manager facilitated structured reflection sessions and coordinated communication among stakeholders.
  • Clinic leadership and providers reviewed feasibility, workflow, and compliance considerations.

Steps in design and planning included:

  • Identifying key friction points (e.g., transportation barriers, fear related to immigration, and no-show policy language)
  • Facilitating caregiver storytelling sessions to gather qualitative data and translate lived experiences into actionable policy recommendations
  • Co-developing revised policy language with clinic leadership to ensure practicality and sustainability
  • Established a recurring forum for continued review and improvement

The clinic assessed internal structures, ensuring leadership buy-in and capacity to act on recommendations.

Partnership

Families were central partners from inception through implementation.

The collaborative used story-based data, facilitated listening sessions, and parent-driven prioritization to identify high-impact policy areas. Parent leaders brought forward examples of how existing rules created unintended consequences and worked with staff to propose alternatives. Examples of family influence include: 

  • Parents recommended a graduated response for missed visits rather than punitive enforcement.
  • Families co-developed new communication pathways to maintain connection even after no-shows.
  • Parent leaders helped draft staff talking points to ensure policy updates were conveyed with empathy and dignity. A parent participant reflected, “Before, we felt punished for things outside our control. Now we feel like the clinic understands us.”

This innovation represents more than a policy revision—it’s a culture shift. By positioning parents as policy designers, Durham PPC is creating a care environment grounded in partnership, respect, and mutual accountability. Families, staff, and leaders now view policy change as a shared process rather than a top-down mandate. As one clinic leader summarized, “We used to make rules for families. Now we make them with familiesand that’s changed everything.” 

Implementation

The collaborative followed a structured, five-stage implementation model: 

  • Stage 1 – Identification and Prioritization: Clinic families identified policy concerns, ranked redesign priorities, and joined the Parent Advisory Team (PAT) to continue the work.
  • Stage 2 – Collaborative Design Sessions: Parent leaders, clinic staff, and care team representatives examined current policies and co-developed recommendations.
  • Stage 3 – Clinic Decisioning and Revision: Leadership reviewed proposals, integrated workflow and compliance considerations, and approved revisions.
  • Stage 4 – Communication and Roll-Out: Updates were shared with staff using messaging co-created by parents, the Pediatrics Supporting Parents (PSP) core team, and clinic leadership.
  • Stage 5 – Feedback Loop and Improvement: PSP program manager and Parent Leaders monitored implementation impact and gathered ongoing community feedback.

Early involvement of providers, practice managers, and parents ensured shared accountability. Regular reflection sessions (“learning loops”) created transparency and sustained trust. 

Changes & Outcomes

The Collaborative has strengthened trust, communication, and engagement between families and clinic teams with a variety of outcomes: 

  • Family outcomes:
    • Caregivers report feeling respected and valued as contributors to clinic improvement.
    • Parents are more likely to communicate barriers and reschedule missed appointments without fear.
    • Families express increased comfort engaging in care planning and follow-up.
  • Clinic and provider outcomes:
    • Early observations suggest reductions in appointment cancellations and no-shows.
    • Providers report improved relationships and communication with families.
    • Staff morale has increased as punitive enforcement decreased and collaboration grew. One provider shared, “We’re not just enforcing policies anymore, we’re solving problems together.”
  • System outcomes:
    • More stable visit patterns and stronger continuity of care
    • Reduced administrative burden and fewer escalations around missed appointments
    • Improved patient experience scores and higher provider satisfaction

Measurement for Success

Data collection combines qualitative and quantitative indicators to monitor relational, operational, and workflow outcomes: 

  • Parent Voice Inquiry Tools including surveys, interviews, and reflective feedback forms capturing family perspectives
  • Staff Feedback Loops including assessments of perceived workload, stress, and satisfaction
  • Policy Adoption Metrics including tracking the number and type of parent-generated recommendations implemented by the clinic
  • Narrative Documentation including stories to illustrate how policy changes have improved trust and re-engagement
  • Case Follow-Up interviews with families affected by new policies to assess experience and continuity of care

Additionally, self-reported clinic data monitor appointment attendance, cancellations, and patient satisfaction. 

Payment & Funding

  • Funding type: A combination of philanthropic support, third-party payor investment, and braided resources across clinical and community partnerships.
  • Anticipated gains:
    • Strengthened workforce retention and morale and reduced staff burnout through clearer policies and shared accountability
    • Improved appointment adherence and continuity of care
    • Increased efficiency and revenue stability by reducing no-shows and lost revenue and administrative time
    • Enhanced family flourishing, trust, and loyalty by empowering parents as policy co-creators, ensuring sustained partnership between clinics and communities that leads to stronger engagement and improved health outcomes

To learn more about this innovation please email Danielle Little, Executive Director at THRIVE Family Health and Education Center: [email protected].